The reporter began by describing normal conditions. "On the reservation many people don't
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3f5/ba3f5d236eb7d382e460a49561bf019523624a56" alt=""
Wait, whoa, hold on, back up. Cell phone service is now considered a "basic need" along with electricity and water? When did that happen?
The story went on to describe how many people have reverted to the barter system to meet their needs and they're doing pretty good and yadda yadda yadda. It was really kind of a puff piece that didn't present any real information. But that one line totally threw me off.
From a global perspective, many people are "worse" off than the Navajo people. Some don't have access to clean water at all, some still live very "primitive" lives in mud houses. Obviously, the writer of the NPR story was writing from an American-centric point of view.
Now, that being said, the Navajo reservation is "in" America (actually, it's a sovereign nation that is surrounded by American soil) and it's hard to think of anyplace "in" America where there is no plumbing and no electricity. But should cell phone service really be considered a basic need? Have we become so techno-dependent that we've come to think of cell-phone coverage as a basic need along with water?
I don't have a cell phone. I haven't had one since I was working.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3bf7/d3bf7224ed561c2968946c82bd9c46736d16c2a3" alt=""
I guess my point is that here in the United States, some people have developed a very skewed view of what they need to "get by". In these hard economic times, we all need to step back and look at what truly is a necessity and what is a luxury. And what about your neighbor? Is your neighbor doing without groceries while you are writing the check for your "basic need" of cable television? Is that guy across the street suffering without an important medication while you are driving around in your "basic need" of a Lexus?
What are your basic needs?